01/27/18 Overnight links

Government surveillance drove Hemingway to kill himself

AS an example of the effect that persistent, total government surveillance has on an individual, look to what likely drove Ernest Hemingway to commit suicide: continuous surveillance by government agents. 

The FBI monitored Hemingway continuously from the 1940s until his suicide in 1961, ostensibly based on his ties to Cuba.  There’s a story of a distraught Hemingway sitting in a restaurant with his wife.  When she asked what was wrong, he responded with, “Those two FBI agents at the bar, that’s what’s wrong.”

This happens to journalists all the time.  Low-level harassment, the purpose being nothing more than breaking the spirit of the target.

Barrett Brown is a more recent example of the psychological effect that the harassment of journalists by armed government agents has.

And there’s the strange death of journalist Michael Hastings, whose car inexplicably accelerated before crashing in a ball of fire.

Wikileaks later released CIA documents revealing that smart cars can be remotely hacked, and that doing so would be a wonderful way to off someone they deemed needed it.

“Beware then, that when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster, and when you stare into the abyss, the abyss also stares into you.” -Nietzche

Tracking the progress of the Surveillance State

In response to a reader email, yes, I read these links.  And as to why I don’t post them Instapundit-style but rather in globs of ten or so, well, it’s because I use the research that I do as well.  It’s easier to scroll back through the blog to find stories when they’re bunched up in one post, as opposed to scattered to the digital winds.  The aim of this site is to be a resource for those who are serious about ending total surveillance, restoring a civilized level of privacy protections for citizens of this country.  When the construction of the Surveillance State here is complete, we will have nowhere to hide from our government.

This has grave implications for our ability to engage in dissent and protest against the crimes of our governments.  What’s more, it will have dire implications for journalism.  Journalists will be tracked and surveiled at a far higher rate than the rest of us.  Passive, pervasive harassment of journalists has the ability to stifle the search for truth, information all of us depend on for an accurate view of what our government is up to.

Governments of the world murdered 252 million unarmed civilians during the twentieth century, not because they suddenly became more cruel, but because they have the means.  Advances in technology and industry during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century gave humankind the ability to wage war on a global scale. So we did.  It gave governments the means also to mass murder their own citizens.  So they did.

To say it can’t happen again is the height of naivete. The chief lesson of history is that governments murder and enslave.  That is not hyperbole, it is fact.  The Surveillance State will empower governments to do far more.  Do I think that mass murder is on the horizon any time soon?  I don’t.  What I believe this surveillance infrastructure will be used for is incremental enslavement, the boxing in of citizens, who aren’t aware of the prison being built around them until they try to escape.  It will by then be too late.  This is why privacy should be enshrined into law on an equal plane with that of free speech.  Our data is ours, our lives are our own.

I also post fun science-y stories.

01/26/18 Morning links

01/26/18 Overnight links