Un-flock yourself

Posted on      by     

In response to the thousands of AI-enabled surveillance cameras installed all over the country over the past two years, a handful of intrepid souls are destroying them.

Charlie Kirk investigators had no idea the crime scene was paved over so soon after murder

Posted on      by     

The site of Kirk’s murder was excavated and paved over within 10 days. The lead investigator (who apparently is….British?) states that he had no idea that the construction would occur. You’d think he’d be slightly miffed that the crime scene was destroyed so completely.

Scenes from the Tyler Robinson clown court

Posted on      by     

Court is being told that there is no video evidence of Tyler Robinson taking the shot. The footage exists, or did previously exist. There are too many cameras at UVU for this to be possible. My guess is that the footage shows the shot being fired from a gun that is very obviously not a WW2 Mauser.

This woman visited UVU and found multiple AI equipped cameras that would’ve captured the shot being taken in 4K

 

Surveillance video shows the shooter wasn’t limping the entire time. Clearly an act. But if it’s an act, why the skinny jeans? Why pretend to have a limp?

The car Tyler Robinson supposedly drove to UVU was seen being driven by a bald man with three other people in tow.

 

Whose birthright?

Posted on      by     

Tuesday’s SCOTUS decision solidified a policy that has been in effect for 100 years: the automatic bestowal of citizenship to anyone born on US soil, no matter their parents’ citizenship status. Academic quibbling over the true meaning of the 14th Amendment and “birthright citizenship” has led to a fork in the road for this nation. What was meant as an assurance that the newly freed slaves and their children would be guaranteed citizenship, has now been interpreted by the highest court in the land to mean that potentially every child in the world could be a US citizen, provided their mother makes it onto US territory to give birth. No sane person could believe this to be a good-faith interpretation. If this had been the true meaning of the 14th Amendment in 1868, it’s authors would have been ridiculed and quite possible beaten, for attempting to hold a vote on such a suicidal policy.

The question really becomes, do we exist to serve the Constitution, or does the Constitution exist to serve us? How long can a nation with birthright citizenship survive without transforming into something utterly alien to what the Founders intended? Whose birthright should matter? American newborns, born to American citizens whose parents were also American citizens, seem to be left out of this equation. What of their birthright to a stable and secure nation, with employment, prosperity, and a government who prioritizes their needs awaiting them? We’ve sold them out.

What could possibly be the outcome of such an interpretation of the 14th, which incentivizes human trafficking from the most unstable, poverty-stricken corners of the globe? Consequences, particularly ones so far-reaching, should be taken into account before making such decisions. Is a nation really a nation when birthright citizenship has been enshrined as law by our highest court?

Does our system of law exist to serve citizens, or the world? There is no middle ground.

Posted on      by