09/26/18 Overnight Links

09/24/18 Overnight Links

The Intercept: Google suppresses memo revealing plans to closely track search users in China

FEE: How the housing crisis vindicated the Austrian School of Economics

RON PAUL: Republicans’ responsibility for socialism’s comeback

The Federalist: Why insider trading shouldn’t be illegal

Techdirt: California police officers used self-destructing messaging app for years

RCP: War on vaping threatens public health

High Times: Canada estimates $1 billion in cannabis sales in the first three months

GRACY OLMSTEAD: We weren’t made for endless work: “It is easy to slip into distractedness and inattentiveness if we are not cultivating daily rhythms that emphasize the present and the real over the possible and the virtual. That’s why Sherry Turkle suggests that we carve out “sacred spaces” in our day in which we set aside our devices and seek to truly focus on each other. The dinner table is a good space for this—but I also feel that I could do a better job abandoning my devices for intentional daily spurts of play with my daughter. Otherwise, leisure is too quickly interrupted by a text or email or phone call.

We don’t always like to hear that rest and “play” can nourish our souls. Owning up to that truth would require slowing down and doing “unimportant” things with no material, measurable benefit. It would require acknowledging our need for grace, and our own inability to accept the world as gift. But our existence was never meant to fixate around work—at least not if the ancients are to be believed. Leisure makes us human.

So go on a walk tomorrow and search for “tiny perfect things.” Play a board game after the dinner dishes are put away. Read a favorite book aloud. Pull out the sidewalk chalk.”

09/20/18 Overnight Links

Overnight Nock

A quote that I’m sure I’ve posted before, from his 1939 essay, published in Mencken’s American Mercury, Albert Jay Nock’s The Criminality of the State: 

“The weaker the State is, the less power it has to commit crime. Where in Europe today does the State have the best criminal record? Where it is weakest: in Switzerland, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Luxembourg, Sweden, Monaco, Andorra. Yet when the Dutch State, for instance, was strong, its criminality was appalling; in Java it massacred 9000 persons in one morning which is considerably ahead of Hitler’s record or Stalin’s. It would not do the like today, for it could not; the Dutch people do not give it that much power, and would not stand for such conduct. When the Swedish State was a great empire, its record, say from 1660 to 1670, was fearful. What does all this mean but that if you do not want the State to act like a criminal, you must disarm it as you would a criminal; you must keep it weak. The State will always be criminal in proportion to its strength; a weak State will always be as criminal as it can be, or dare be, but if it is kept down to the proper limit of weakness – which, by the way, is a vast deal lower limit than people are led to believe – its criminality may be safely got on with.

So it strikes me that instead of sweating blood over the iniquity of foreign States, my fellow-citizens would do a great deal better by themselves to make sure that the American State is not strong enough to carry out the like iniquities here. The stronger the American State is allowed to grow, the higher its record of criminality will grow, according to its opportunities and temptations. If, then, instead of devoting energy, time, and money to warding off wholly imaginary and fanciful dangers from criminals thousands of miles away, our people turn their patriotic fervor loose on the only source from which danger can proceed, they will be doing their full duty by their country.”

09/19/18 Overnight Links

09/14/18 Links

What. The. Heck? Popular Mechanics: FBI mysteriously close National Solar Observatory in New Mexico

The Intercept: Senior Google scientist resigns over “forfeiture of our values” in China

Techdirt: European Court of Human Rights: UK surveillance revealed by Snowden violates human rights

Activist Post: A brief history of repressive regimes and their gun laws

The Week: The case for the American bobby

National Review: Did France’s gun control hurt its resistance to the Nazis?

JIM BOVARD: Barack Obama’s return just reminds us how he fueled the distrust that led to Trump

JUSTIN RAIMONDO: Defeat the Deep State:The Deep State – i.e. the constellation of national security agencies and private actors who have directed and maintained our globalist foreign policy since the end of World War II – would have targeted Trump in any case, due to his hostility to their interventionist foreign policy. And yet I believe they would’ve gone after him anyway due to his populist outsider persona, which the self-appointed guardians of the Empire consider dangerous per se.

The bottom line is that the intelligence services of the United States, and top officials of the FBI, have indeed launched a regime change operation comparable to the dozens carried out by these very same spooks over the years from Latin America to the Middle East. Like most of these campaigns, it’s a multilateral effort, with the intelligence services of at least three “allied” countries involved. Co-authored with the Clintonistas, the Russia-gate hoax is their invention: it was the perfect pretext to conduct surveillance on a rival presidential campaign. For all the talk of “collusion,” the real colluders were the Obama administration and the Clinton campaign organization who utilized the British “former” MI6 agent, Christopher Steele, and his infamous dossier. This fake intelligence was used by the Justice Department to justify spying on Carter Page, George Pappadapoulos, and other Trump campaign contacts.”

Reason: DHS gave ICE an extra $169 billion to detain and remove immigrants last month

09/13/18 Overnight Links

09/12/18 Overnight Links

Quote of the Day

Comes from Shackle’s singular 1972 work, Epistemics and Economics: 

“If there is a fundamental conflict between the appeal to rationality and the consideration of the consequence of time as it imprisons us in actuality, the theoretician is confronted with a stark choice. He can reject rationality or time. The theory which rejects time has certain technical features, often referred to as, respectively, subjective marginalism, the market mechanism, and partial equilibrium…

…The other road consists in abandoning, not the word ‘time’, but its meaning of a forceps which grips us between the past which is unchoosable and the future which is unknowable.”

Shackle’s Orphic prose accurately captures the strangeness of our predicament. We are, in a sense, imprisoned by time. Despite that, our species moves through time and into an unknowable future and not only survives, but thrives. The strangeness stems from the fact that it shouldn’t be possible beyond the most basic of plans. Yet complex plans are carried out, economic calculations are accurately made, people are fed, clothed, housed, entertained, etc. And not in spite of the complexity of society, but because of it. The greatest attribute of our species is its ability to unwittingly generate vast cultural and social complexity as a way to solve the problems of time and ignorance.