The health of a civilization can be judged in large part by how it deals with violent crime. Major metropolitan areas in the US have for years approached crime, and repeat offenders, with kiddie gloves. Many of these criminals, human only in a strictly biological sense, are arrested, kept in custody for a few days, and then released, only to offend again, usually in a much more violent and destructive way. People who know the facts, or who know the killer or victims personally, are never surprised. They do postmortem interviews and make it fairly clear that the latest atrocity was inevitable once a particular killer was released. It’s their nature, they are beyond reform, and should never have been let loose again.
Many of these animals are repeat violent offenders, and yet they are let loose each time, and the unsuspecting civilian population is made to deal with them. Someone is punched, raped, or killed, and then finally, after some ultimate crime, we get a courtroom full of crying family members, witnesses, and prosecutors telling the jury that this worthless piece of human excrement had a rap sheet spanning New York state. We all wonder how it could have come to this, how this or that innocent person is now dead because this savage was allowed to roam freely until he killed.
Repeat violent offenders cannot be rehabilitated, and we have a right to live free of their presence. Jose Ibarra here shouldn’t be “sent home”, he should simply be put to death. Humanely, of course. It is plain to see that this thing is totally devoid of empathy, or anything resembling human feeling. “You have your constitutional rights!” say the criminal justice reformers, defense attorneys, and the ACLU. But rights are reserved for the peaceful, the human, among us. Not animals. Dangerous animals that have killed others are euthanized. Ibarra should be given the same comfort, the same human rights, as a rabid grizzly. Courts are nothing more than a charade for these inhuman aberrations. Should he die the same violent death as his victim? Some would say yes. I say to simply give him the needle, in unceremonious and rapid fashion, preferably in the courtroom immediately after the verdict is read. Let the world see it, and understand. Would this ever happen? Of course not. Not amid our present moral decay, where rabid animals are continually let loose, under a tragically misguided belief that these animals deserve sympathy. The swift justice would heal us, and set an example for foreign nations and would-be migrants: keep your animals at home.
A reimagining of our approach to crime must happen soon. We must remove the bleeding hearts from policy formulation. They are the reason that born killers and violence-prone walk freely after each new rampage. Here’s a simple formulation: two violent crimes within the span of a year? Life behind bars with no chance of parole. The lizard-like murder of a female jogger? Instant death. We should begin to demand our rights to safety from these thugs. We are the peaceful, the taxpaying, the human. What about us? How does the emotional state of a repeat offender matter more than the safety of the peaceful? Do some people deserve to die? Look at Jose here, learn about his crime, and ask yourself: does he deserve to die? Some crimes are beyond redemption, criminals acts so terrible that their perpetrator, in a just society, forfeits his life.
https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1857556170250268743
