A Sprint cell tower was installed on an elementary school campus in Ripon, California, (why, exactly?) in 2015. Since then, four students developed aggressive cancer, along with three teachers. The parents blame the cell tower for obvious reasons, and Sprint sent in a spokesman armed with a stack of industry-funded studies. Thankfully, the parents didn’t buy the bullcrap that was being sold to them, and now Sprint and the school have been sufficiently pressured to remove the cell tower.
The question, now, is: what about 5G? Thousands of cell towers identical to the Ripon tower will be placed everywhere. The wireless radiation will be ubiquitous, there will be no place to escape from it. What will be the rate of cancer after a decade of blanketing entire populations in 5G radiation?
A crucial lesson from the Ripon debacle is to never trust industry-funded science. It’s the same “science” that the tobacco industry used to “prove” that smoking cigarettes won’t give you lung cancer. It’s the same “science” that Merck has used to grease the gears for wide acceptance and distribution of the murderous Gardasil vaccine. But people who have seen the effects up close on a family member, usually won’t buy the BS that corporate reps use to cover up these crimes. What are people going to believe, what a stooge from Sprint says about the safety of a cell tower, or their own eyes?
Much of this industry-funded science uses the easily manipulable “epidemiological study” to finesse the desired facts. The susceptibility to fraud inherent in the epidemiological study was encapsulated perfectly by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. when he said that you could easily manipulate an epidemiological study to prove that having sex didn’t cause pregnancy.
Industry scientists are basically the propaganda arm for their particular industry, and it’s nearly impossible to fight it. They buy the media and the politicians. Just look at how long it took to get a judgment on the non-Hodgkin Lymphoma-inducing glyphosate in Roundup. But the propaganda arms extend from the industry and into the regulatory agencies tasked with monitoring them. “Regulatory capture” takes place, which means that an industry begins staffing the agency with industry toadies, blessing the industry with a facade of objective science and accountability. Industry science infects the regulatory agencies, and these agencies begin to resist and suppress independent, actual science.
