A core tenet of the vaccine orthodoxy is that we would be overrun by medieval disease were it not for the heroic efforts of the vaccine schedule, and of the upstanding citizens who go under the needle for the sake of herd immunity. If that is the case, what about all the infectious diseases for which no vaccine exists? Why don’t we feel for scarlet fever the same superstitious fear that smallpox and polio conjure in the public mind? Scarlet fever racked up a body count far higher than both smallpox and polio before the end of the 19th century, at which time mortality an complications from the disease suddenly and dramatically declined. Without the aid of a vaccine, too, which is fundamental to understanding the deception behind modern vaccine orthodoxy.
The deception is this: that vaccines have anything at all to do with “herd immunity”. If they were society’s sole bulwark against infectious disease, we’d have been overrun long ago. There exist far more dangerous infections that we presently have a vaccine for, yet we aren’t constantly victimized by pandemics.
At best, vaccines are conferring little to no immunity to the recipient. At worst, vaccines are condemning children to living with a wrecked immune system, as the inoculation tricks the body into manufacturing antibodies against proteins that are widespread throughout the itself. All in the service of a false ideology.
A relatively plain truth is that if vaccines were safe and effective, no mandate would be necessary. People would sign up without any cajoling, shaming, or bullying. Only dangerous, defective products need expensive propaganda campaigns to trick the public into making a purchase, and the public quickly realizes they’ve been scammed. Of course, that is when coercion enters the picture. Government mandates are then rolled out, drafting the public into a domestic campaign that few, if any, have any faith in. Rather than abandoning the misbegotten policy, government doubles down, because they’ve got too much riding on the enterprise for it to fail.
The introduction of coercion is an admission of failure, whether in a war abroad or a domestic public policy. If the public will only participate when they’re looking down a barrel, it’s time to cut your losses.
