What awaits the wicked beyond the grave?

On this blue globe, suspended in a limitless, black abyss that appears all but lifeless, save for us, we are given the gift and burden of choice, and whoever gave us this gift and put us here, now watches to see what we do with it. Some choose to be good for 60 years of their life, up until they make the decision to firebomb 100,000 civilians. This sin annuls whatever good had come before, and now all that is left for him is to await death, and judgment.

Good people always seem to backpedal into evil, their lives irrevocably altered within a matter of minutes or seconds. They become evil, or were in some kind of Schrödinger’s Cat state, neither good nor evil because a crisis moment hadn’t yet arrived at their feet, a time when they were presented with a choice: the easy, evil choice, or the difficult, good choice.

Pay attention to the testimony of damned souls, whether they bear medals or await the needle. In some undefinable way, they know that a judgment has been rendered, and they await their fate.

Should America close the money hole?

This is where we’re at. We’ve become this Onion sketch. “America needs the money hole!” It’s funny, because it’s true. How pathetic. The hole will always be with us, and our leaders will always be pro-hole. At least we can laugh, amirite?

At another level, I really wish we did have a money hole, and the worst thing done with our taxed trillions was that it was burned. No wars, no insane entitlement programs, no corporate welfare. And if the Federal Reserve didn’t exist, the money hole would create deflation, increasing the value the money we still do possess. So, in one sense, I am pro hole, and anti-printing press.

”I love the money fires!”

Washington DC is occupied territory

And its occupants are not foreign-born, but rather foreign agents. The images and footage of virtually our entire Congress waving little blue and yellow flags after the vote to continue funding Ukraine’s self-genocide are grating, and disheartening in a way that feels like our nation is irrevocably condemned to its role as international buffet. Picked apart by vultures, but only because it’s allowed by the supposed stewards of this nation. It’s difficult to find words to express the feelings that arise when watching 80-somethings waving their Ukrainian flag and grinning like clowns after a further facilitation of the rape of the American taxpayer, and the slaughter of faraway innocents. Why does activism never bear fruit? Why does the avalanche of columns, books, news stories, podcasts, documentaries, and whistleblowers never translate into an American government that doesn’t sell out American citizens? This includes both Oklahoma senators, Lankford and Mullin, both traitors who engaged in the latest official act of treason with their vote in favor of more aid to the Ukraine and Gaza abattoirs.

What is the answer, what is the way forward, when all our efforts amount seemingly to nothing? We’re basically back at square one, with a single organism comprised of the majority of our elected politicians acting and speaking with one voice. The answer, depressingly, is that our government doesn’t change, because the people who vote haven’t changed. They’re the same stupid crowd who show up faithfully at the voting booth, blissfully ignorant of any and all issues that affect their nation, and vote in the same manner that they cheer during a football game. What we do doesn’t reach them, because they are unreachable. This is the work of Boobus Americanus, and he is not going away any time soon. In fact, I don’t believe he will ever go away. He is eternal. He is America’s destiny, and ultimate destroyer. The popular election of senators, at the very least, must end. Senators must again be chosen by each state’s legislature. Will this fix much? It would at the very least place a much needed firewall between the wildfires of democracy, and actual legislation. I am for the popular election of Presidents. Can I explain rationally why I think democracy shines only in this regard? I can’t, aside from the strange statement that the only moment that democracy can show a trace of wisdom is when electing a single ruler. Conventional wisdom goes against everything I’ve just advocated for, but the again, conventional wisdom has given us the abomination we witnessed with the foreign aid vote. Nothing for our own nation, only other nations. This is treason, which is a word that should again mean something.

I don’t know what the answer is going forward. I only know that we must course correct, because our current efforts are in vain.

Tucker begins asking tentative questions regarding technological progress

This is interesting. More people are beginning to question the fundamental tenets of technological progress, specifically: whether we are truly helpless before it, and whether it is inevitable. The real question should surround the type of technological progress occurring, namely the all-consuming digital opiate that we’ve stumbled upon, nurtured an addiction to, while bringing our children into the fold before we’ve even gained our footing. No it is not inevitable, yes we should have a say in our own destiny and that of our children and grandchildren. “Connectedness” has been a mirage that we’ve allowed ourselves to be dragged, deep into the desert. Along the way we’ve lost so much. What we’ve lost cannot be quantified. They are the experiences that our children will never know, nor future generations, if the technological cancer isn’t ground to a halt. The instant gratification of the screen, the mind-addling opiate of “convenience”, the brave new world looked forward to in decades past is now here. We see for ourselves that it is no Ultima Thule. Instead, we see everyone around us being infantilized, culture itself infantilized, by this technological god, robbing us of the real.

Incomprehensible evil

We have no inkling of the evil lying at the heart of the Zionist state. The level of depravity and evil that the Israelis have put on display is sadistic, satanic, unforgivable.

Is Middle East conflict an unsolvable problem?

Or is there an artificial situation preventing the solution to the problem of violence? At one time I believed the violence was inevitable. Just a permanent aspect of the region and the people there. Now I’m not so sure.