How body cams can be a win for Surveillance State

When those cameras tie into a real-time facial recognition database.  An officer becomes a de facto, walking, real-time surveillance tower. NBC News

Police body cams are an unequivocal good.  When cops know they are being filmed, they behave better.  The problems with implementation, though, appear to be how easily the cop can turn the camera on or off, what the punishment is for not activating the camera before an incident, and whether the cameras further the aims of total surveillance.  The solution seems to be to take away control of the body cam from the cop, and severe the connection between the cameras and facial recognition surveillance.  In the end, it may still be up to private citizens to take the initiative and film police encounters.

 

Secretive Stingray surveillance tool can also block phone calls

GovTech. The Stingray mimics an actual cell tower, so all phones in the vicinity link to it.  Besides the obvious problem of warrantless, mass surveillance, if someone needs to place an emergency phone call, that call might not go through the Stingray, placing innocent lives in danger.  While some of the devices do allow 911 calls to pass through, most non-emergency calls do not.

“It’s hard to know with certainty how many innocent cellphone users have experienced jamming due to police use of cell-site simulators. Federal restrictions on information about their use prevents collecting such details.”

The article notes that 68 gov’t agencies are running around with these $40,000 spy tools.  The FBI alone uses 194 of these cell-site simulators.

It seems that the eagerness to acquire more powerful spy goodies outstrips law enforcements’ ability or desire to control their use.

Fear of independent media drives alarm-ringing over “fake news”

New York Post A big thorn in the side of the political class, one that they would refuse to admit exists, is the easy access to alternative opinion pieces, rather than news per se.  A good skewering by a skilled writer over corroborated facts, cranked out on a daily basis, can inflict quite a bit of damage. How do they propose to regulate that?

Establishment propaganda outlet get roasted by independent news sites

CounterPunch.  It is laughable that anyone would take WaPo’s alarmist article over Russian-controlled “fake news” seriously.  I mean, come on people, the writing at Antiwar.com, Counter Punch, or the other list of sites supposedly on Putin’s payroll is so far above anything the Washington Post puts out, that it would be insane to believe that they are part of some Russian-controlled conspiracy.  The Establishment media hates alternative, independent news, dissenting voices, etc.  That’s why they remove their comments sections, the sheer volume of ridicule was too much to bear.