We’ll all be affected by the outcome of the FBI’s war on encryption

Read the joint statement by Access Now, the ACLU, and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

It’s impossible to compromise between liberty and tyranny, in the same way it’s impossible to compromise between encryption and no encryption.  You can’t build a partial backdoor, or make a partial key, and only tyrants present false choices such as this to the people.

Federal Reserve activity accounts for 93% of market moves since ’08

Money Morning.  A phony-baloney tidal wave of paper dollars, backed up by a shrinking number of American private-sector workers, provided the necessary phony growth numbers that have been trotted out each quarter as proof that the massive intervention in the economy staved off another depression.  The Fed’s paper arsenal, which is all it has, is now empty.

Hillary has a Honduran coup problem

Top story at Truth Out, Foreign Policy in Focus, and other outlets.  Honduran activists are being murdered by a regime that forcibly took power in 2009, and Hillary strong-armed the State Department into looking the other way.  Not that it would be relevant to a non-interventionist country when another country’s military overthrows their elected government, but, considering the hyperinterventionist nature of our Federal gov’t, it’s almost a certainty there lies some interest or advantage in allowing the coup to take place.

Apple engineers may just quit their job if demanded by the FBI to write backdoor code

NY Times.  Even if the FBI wins its court fight with Apple, they’ll still have a problem with Apple engineers, who will either refuse to write the code, or quit.  And this: “The fear of losing a paycheck may not have much of an impact on security engineers whose skills are in high demand. Indeed, hiring them could be a badge of honor among other tech companies that share Apple’s skepticism of the government’s intentions.”

Prominent American Muslim cleric condemns Drug War

Raw Story: “He argues that while Islam forbids intoxicants, it does not treat addiction as an existential threat. “The primary purpose of law in Islam is to preserve life and order in society, not to create a machine of incarceration and punishment.” According to Malik, declaring “war” on drugs is a breach of  both US constitutional and Islamic principals: “The War on Drugs and the War on Terror have both given way to legalized injustice. Using the rhetoric of ‘war’ tends to subvert constitutional safeguards in the legal system, thus eroding our commitment to democracy.”

In regards to the Prophet Mohammed, Malik believes that his law was intended to protect people and not destroy their lives: “His aim was not to punish people, but to save them from their wrong behavior.””