The Oregon Revelation

For some reason, due to the recent revelation that citizens of Oregon have never pumped their own gas into their vehicles in their lives, those people feel more foreign to me than a Russian or Pole does.  Even they have to drag themselves out of their cars in the ice cold, cursing silently, as they wait for their car to slowly fill up.  But Oregonians have never done this.  Instead, an attendant comes out and does it for them.  Which wouldn’t be bad at all if it were occurring in a free market.  But Oregon’s government has, until recently, mandated that attendants only can pump gas.  The reaction from Oregonians themselves is hilarious, but fascinating:

Image may contain: text

It’s normal for every single person in most other states to pump their own gas.  Oregon’s citizens know this.  Yet their attitude is one of the above.  Maybe it’s another example of government’s ability to infantilize its population.  And maybe that attitude is not quite representative of all Oregonians.

 

Image may contain: fire and text

01/05/18 Morning links

01/05/18 Overnight Rothbard reading assignment

His essays, A Fable for Our Times by One of the Unreconstructed

In Defense of Demagogues

This is in no way a defense of Trump’s ignorant buffoonery, but rather the rare, unfiltered, intelligent subversive who speaks in uncompromising terms.  We want liberty now.  Half-measures and decades of concessions have brought us to the brink of collapse.  There is nothing more to concede.  The future of our children has been tethered to debt we have allowed to accrue, they are born into a Surveillance State continuously at war, forced to use money continuously drained of its value by a central bank.  That there is no compromise with evil is the first lesson to learn in order to restore liberty.  Be unreconstructed.

 

01/05/18 Overnight links

01/04/18 Midday links

Of IQ scores, law enforcement employment policy, and police brutality

Is there anything more terrifying than a dumb person with a gun?  Well, there are, but an armed dumb person is bad, and if they’ve got a badge pinned to their chest, they have the potential to become a living nightmare.  This situation, however, is the norm within the nation’s police departments, who’s officers have a mean IQ score of 104.  That’s not all that low, and not exactly “dumb”,with the mean IQ score for US citizens being 98, but a court ruling from 2000 casts a shadow over the correlation between IQ and employment opportunities within law enforcement.  Basically, the court ruled that the police can refuse to hire someone based on an IQ that is too high. Robert Jordan applied for a job as an officer but was rejected based an IQ score of 125 which was deemed too high.  The court ruled that the department had a right to discriminate based on IQ because it could possibly result in lower turn-over.  Theoretically, smarter people would get bored with police work and quit.  Seems like any company could then discriminate based on IQ, which I believe is within their right, but I also believe something else is at play here.

Smarter people are less likely to be overtaken by emotion, less likely to follow an order that could lead to harm of someone.  It would be interesting to see the IQ score of the SWAT cop who recently murdered a young father-of-two who did nothing more than answer the door, or Philip Brailsford, the Arizona cop who murdered a prone and sobbing Daniel Shaver, also a young father-of-two.  It should be noted that Shaver’s 8-year old daughter said she “wanted to die” so she could be with her daddy.

Brailsford clearly looks like a dim bulb, and has a history of unnecessarily injecting violence into situations.  But it would be interesting to see the results of an IQ test.  I imagine he’s on the left side of the bell curve.

I write this also because of my interactions with police.  While cordial, they are clearly very emotional people.  I don’t believe its the nature of their job, which is safer than most, but rather the screening process.

Could higher intelligence standards, more comprehensive IQ tests, lead to fewer deaths at the hands of American cops?  I have a feeling it could.

The wrong way to legalize marijuana

Heavily taxing and regulating a plant that anyone can easily grow in their homes doesn’t really sound like wise public policy.  But California is currently attempting it, and I suspect the situation is going to end in only one way: a massive black market in homegrown, untaxed marijuana.  Which means California will actually lose out on millions in revenue.  But while California’s rate is $9.25 per ounce, Washington taxes its weed at a mindboggling $50 per ounce.  How is that really any different from straight-up prohibition?  Cartels, or the elderly couple down the street, will step in and provide tax-free weed, and make a fortune.

This provides a pretty good example of the nature of economics, which is truly is nothing more than refined, and consistently applied, common sense, as Joseph Schumpeter explained to the world.  If it can be easily grown in your home, why not just do that rather than buy an expensive product from a third party? This isn’t the cure for baldness, or cancer, or the iPhone they’re trying to tax at this rate.  It’s a small plant that anyone can grow, anywhere.  Policy makers should ruminate on that for at least a moment before they wave the tax wand.

Ed: It’s my belief that marijuana should be legalized completely, with no tax rate other than the usual sales tax that we pay for everything else.  The only regulation being a prohibition on selling it to kids.  Why not just allow a multi-billion dollar industry to spring up, flourish unrestrained, and create millions of high-paying jobs?  It’s a plant that anyone can grow.  How are you going to regulate and tax that?  Just step back and let the market do its magic.

New year, new look

Don’t be alarmed. I’m currently experimenting with the layout of the site, but the content will always be the same.  If you have suggestions/comments/gripes, send them to digitalsunset86@gmail.com.

Thanks for the page views and welcome to all the new readers.  This site is basically a stripped-down news aggregation site from the point of view of someone deeply affected by the ideas of liberty as espoused by Ayn Rand, Ludwig von Mises, Friedrich Hayek, Albert Jay Nock, etc.  The point of view, also, from someone involved with the ‘Ron Paul Revolution’ and who holds a desire to complete that peaceful, philosophical revolution in our lifetimes.  It was a true revolution for liberty, the most radical political movement this country has ever seen.  So, there will be news aggregation, but also short commentary, important quotes, important essays, important research.  I will post what I deem “important” from my ‘libertarian’ political perspective, which is nothing more complicated than a desire to see voluntary interaction between consenting adults expanded into as many areas of life as possible.  I’ve written regularly for several publications before, but now, my writing will appear exclusively at Republic Reborn.  I picked this name for this blog because I feel it conveys the attitude, and goal, of Paul’s revolution.  A resurgence of liberty, a dying republic, reborn on the ideals that it was originally founded upon.

In other news, the home of the majority of my writing over the past three years, Red Dirt Report, will be shuttered by its editor in one month.  Here is a link to my articles from there, read them while you can.

Also, the number of page views I wake up to has become alarmingly high, which means I will shortly get my act together and get you early-birds more content. Never fear, and thanks for reading.

01/04/18 Morning links

01/04/18 Overnight links