This is what happens when concerned moms go find info about school mask policies, then someone else combines that with official data sources on cases.
Have you seen anything like this from the "experts"? https://t.co/4SIdgub82J
— Jennifer Cabrera š #SmilesMatter (@jhaskinscabrera) March 18, 2021
Fireworks between @RandPaul and Dr. Fauci on the subject of masks. Dr. Fauci has no rebuttal and can't cite ANY science to support his claims.
If you are vaccinated – you should be able to take off your mask. PERIOD. pic.twitter.com/wt5tWcFDQS
— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) March 18, 2021
2020 has provided endless reasons why people have fought so hard for Constitutional limitations on government power.
Michigan Polish bistro owner ordered to turn herself in for defying C19 edicts: Pavlos-Hackney compared the situation to “how political prisoners were treated in the Soviet Union under Stalin.”https://t.co/BKkoKhJj6l
ā Andrew Bostom, MD, MS (@andrewbostom) March 18, 2021
That's how you know masks are about control
Not health https://t.co/WxyOUfyrJN— Dittohead Dr Jhawkcat #DitchMitch #FireCheney (@jhawkcat) March 17, 2021
Tucker covers an incident that perfectly illustrates the violence inherent within the mask cult. Comply or be beaten, or worse. And it only took a few months for us all to fall into this way of life, where we could stand by and watch with gratitude as an elderly woman is treated like a dog over a worse-than-useless piece of cloth. No one came to her aid, or voiced their objection at all. They looked down their noses at the āotherā, someone receiving a much-deserved punishment for flouting the rules. Hereās where public school conditioning comes into play: mindless obedience to authority, acceptance of punishment for violations, no matter how minor, and approval of punishment inflicted on others for perceived violations, regardless of the rightness or wrongness of the act itself. A perfectly obedient little cog in a big machine.
Tucker Carlson on CNN's contention that wearing a mask will help us "return to normal."
"Because it's totally normal to shield your face from the people around you. That's not weird. It's always been this way."
"Don't for a moment think they're making it up as they go along." pic.twitter.com/qXAHUlewBl
— Scott Morefield (@SKMorefield) March 16, 2021
Banning the use of a vaccine after temporally-connected deaths/injuries is a very healthy development, because it is a sign that governments and community leaders are refusing to self-censor or stay quiet for the supposed greater good of protecting the reputation of vaccines in general. But where is the outrage over temporally-associated deaths and injuries stemming from the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines? Itās only a matter of time before that erupts as well.
And only time will tell if Bosscheās warning of the possibility of mass āimmune escapeā pans out, as the masses are given a vaccine that suppresses symptoms but does not prevent transmission, placing enormous pressure on the virus to mutate and learn to evade our immune system.
Two weeks ago, Mississippi removed all of its mask mandates, while Alabama didnāt.
The President said what MS did was āNeanderthal thinkingā because masks are science, of course.
Well guys, based on the results, Iād say we have a clear victory for the Neanderthals over science. pic.twitter.com/NOh177iT9L
— IM (@ianmSC) March 17, 2021
You should not be getting the Covid vaccine just so that your life can get back to normal. Medical decisions should be made based on having analyzed the pros/cons of the vaccine and not the threat of having your freedoms restricted.
No to medical extortion.
— Michael (@HegKong@gab.com) (@HegKong) March 17, 2021
You know what our teachers in California deserve? A trip to Hawaii on taxpayer's dime. I mean… they've worked so HARD this year.
(this is infuriating)https://t.co/xwrG0sai7q
— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) March 17, 2021
6,750 children between 6 months and 12 years of age will be enrolled in the trial. How is this legal/ethical? COVID-19 poses no real risk to children. Far less than the flu. The children cannot give informed consent, and we now know that these mRNA vaccines do cause harm to those who receive them. How can this be justified, knowing that many of the trial participants will be seriously injured?