Over 4,000 men, women, and children protested for over 8 hours at the New Jersey state capitol yesterday, voicing their staunch opposition to a bill that would remove all non-medical exemptions that parents currently enjoy as is their right in the state. After waiting for half the day, the protesters and everyone following the story online were ecstatic to hear that the bill, S2173, had been pulled and would not be voted on until January. The bill itself was apparently held up by state senator Joe Lagana, who is now a hero amongst the vaccine risk-aware movement. I can’t imagine the threats, and promises of riches and reward he received once it became clear that it was his vote that would decide the fate of thousands of families. I can’t imagine the level of harassment and under-the-table bribery he’ll be subjected to for the next month.

Now, for one small nitpick/suggestion/word salad: these exemptions shouldn’t be dubbed “religious” or “philosophical”. It should be called a scientific exemption. The science shows that the dangers of vaccination are much higher than the public is being told. This, of course, is due to the fact that public confidence must remain high in the program if vaccine rates are to remain high.  But if vaccine injury is far higher than the public is led to believe, then this confidence is artificial.

What percentage of the public knows that vaccine manufacturers can’t be sued over a vaccine injury? What percent knows that over $4 billion has been paid out in vaccine injury settlements, $220 million in 2019 alone? How many know that only 1% of vaccine injuries are ever even reported? How many know of the deceptive behavior of Merck during the testing of its HPV vaccine Gardasil? How many have heard of Hannah Poling? How many know that the vaccine court routinely compensates cases of “vaccine-induced brain damage”, which is a euphemism for vaccine-induced autism? How many even know of the existence of the vaccine court?

How high would their confidence be if they were aware of just those facts?

How long can a government program rely on censorship and coercion? At some point there will be a massive revolt against it, and public confidence will collapse completely.

Far from an elimination of exemptions, we need a new category: the scientific exemption.

Vaccine Impact has the story.

The full article, published in Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.

You don’t have to be “anti-vaccine” to understand the dangers surrounding the presence of aluminum, mercury, polysorbate 80, and other substances in pediatric vaccines, yet somehow it’s been made a “pro-vax vs. anti-vax” debate, and everyone is expected to take one side or the other. Anyone who poses any questions at all is immediately dubbed “anti-vax”, and their concerns are dismissed. This is increasingly ridiculous. No one would tolerate this repressive environment with respect to any other pharmaceutical product. Yet it is the reigning state of affairs in the realm of vaccine policy.

Astounding things are happening in Oklahoma. Cowboy Cup is an event that no one would’ve dreamed could have occurred in Stillwater.

Is the Democratic Party looking for a savior in Big Pharma? It certainly appears so, as every vote on vaccine mandates at the state level has been split down party lines, with the Democrats virtually unanimous in support, and Republicans opposed. Every instance proves this, including the latest vote in New Jersey, where a bill to remove religious exemptions passed out of committee after some shady dealing by chairman Joseph Vitale where he replaced three more obstinate Democratic committee members with three that would vote ‘yes’. Bill sponsor and Democrat Herb Conway rewrote the language of the bill without a public hearing to call for an outright ban on religious exemption. The bill passed out of committee along strict party lines. Indicative of the level of corruption present is the fact that the bill was placed on next Monday’s legislative agenda before the committee vote. The Democrats knew it would pass.

The Republican Party has been, and will continue to be, the sole political barrier to vaccine mandates. It’s my belief that the Republican party is moving in a more liberty-oriented direction. Many individual Republicans that have virulently and eloquently opposed these mandates have shown themselves to be some of liberty’s fiercest defenders. The Democratic party almost to a member lacks the courage to take stands on principle. Why is that?

The 112-Year Odyssey of Pertussis and Pertussis Vaccines–Mistakes Made and Implications for the Future

“In the last 13 years, major pertussis epidemics have occurred in the United States, and numerous studies have shown the deficiencies of DTaP vaccines, including the small number of antigens that the vaccines contain and the type of cellular immune response that they elicit. The type of cellular response a predominantly, T2 response results in less efficacy and shorter duration of protection. Because of the small number of antigens (3-5 in DTaP vaccines vs >3000 in DTwP vaccines), linked-epitope suppression occurs. Because of linked-epitope suppression, all children who were primed by DTaP vaccines will be more susceptible to pertussis throughout their lifetimes, and there is no easy way to decrease this increased lifetime susceptibility.”

The solution, of course, is not to bring back the dangerous, immune system-wrecking DTP vaccine. The deaths and encephalopathy that resulted from DTP, and the many lawsuits brought by the parents of injured children, led to the National Vaccine Injury Act, along with blanket legal immunity afforded to vaccine manufacturers.

The Washington Post recently published classified communications that seemingly prove that everyone up and down the chain of command knew that the Afghan war was one giant whopper the whole time. The media darlings of the donor class are talking about it. “Think pieces” are being written, excoriating this state of affairs.

Jimmy Dore had a great line on the 18th anniversary of the war: “The Afghanistan war is now old enough to fight in the Afghanistan war”. So after 18 years, and more money spent there than was spent in the Marshall Plan after World War 2, nothing much has changed in that faraway land, and lies sustained the entire enterprise.

What I want to know is this: why is anyone surprised? Writers and reporters have been shouting about this expensive, murderous, wasteful mess for years. Few have been listening, though. Only now, even many of the people who lukewarmly supported the Afghanistan war, or didn’t have the spine or interest to say anything, now oppose it. And now I see all the mainstream writers suddenly find the courage to write some bold piece about how Afghanistan is a travesty. What I want to know is this: where were you when it mattered? Summer soldiers are coming out the woodwork, and their newly-found self-righteousness is nauseating.

First of all, it has never been a war. It’s been an occupation by a foreign power. The U.S. military has occupied Afghanistan for 18 years, performing police actions, and fighting off any natives who become angry enough to fight back.

And we’ve known it was an expensive lie. How could anyone not see that the United States’ longest, most expensive war ever, was not producing anything remotely resembling “progress”? They didn’t even have a clear idea of what progress would look like, and they couldn’t communicate it to the public. But everyone, the public, the media, our own government, didn’t even care about this war. It was placed on the back burner, and ignored. The “Afghanistan War” became almost a fact of nature, the very archetype of perpetual war. Everyone saw the truth, but for 18 years no one cared. That is the real travesty.

From earlier this year, but very relevant.

Relevant, because aluminum is used as a primary adjuvant in pediatric vaccines. The hepatitis B vaccine, given on the first day of life, contains 250 mcg of aluminum. Several months later, an infant is given multiple injections at once, with varying levels of aluminum, all in one doctor’s visit. How are these vaccines, and adjuvants, interacting with one another? No one knows, because there have never been tests done to ensure the safety of combining vaccines. This is something that would never be done with any other pharmaceutical, yet it occurs regularly in regard to vaccines. Children regularly receive the live-virus MMR vaccine in conjunction with the aluminum-boosted Dtap. How is the aluminum affecting the body’s response to the MMR? The aluminum is used to trigger an immune response so the body will manufacture antibodies. But what else is the body manufacturing antibodies to fend off? Could it be that the vaccine induces the production of antibodies for proteins present throughout the recipient’s body? Is this why almost every vaccine injury manifests as an autoimmune disorder, where the recipient’s immune system begins attacking the body? This is a scandal of mammoth proportions, the biggest that the pharmaceutical industry will have ever seen. It might cause the public to lose faith in the vaccine program, but if the true severe injury rate is closer to 10 or 15%, then that program does not deserve the faith of the public.

Note: The main defense of the use of aluminum as an adjuvant is that everyone unwittingly consumes aluminum everyday through various foods. True, but this aluminum is filtered out by our gastro-intestinal system. The vaccine bypasses this miracle of evolution and goes straight into the muscle, the blood, and much of it ends up in the brain.

This sanguine attitude toward aluminum in pediatric vaccines is surreal, as the presence of aluminum in other consumer products is fretted over. Think about the collective realization that our bodies have been absorbing the aluminum present in antiperspirants. We shouldn’t blindly defer to authority, particularly on a matter concerning the health and safety of our infant children. We should open our eyes and use our own minds on the matter.