Lots and lots to go over, as quite a bit of new and damning information has emerged surrounding Thomas Crooks and his failed assassination of Trump. We’ve now learned that the shooter was a member of a high-profile shooting club, frequented by law enforcement for training purposes. Another account has tracked Crooks’ phone, and found several eyebrow-raising destinations:

Here is a quote from a recent CBS article:

“The sources familiar with the briefing told CBS News that among the evidence that law enforcement found on and near the gunman’s body was an AR-style rifle, a remote transmitter and a primary cellphone. Sources said investigators found two explosive devices, a drone, a tactical vest and four magazines of the same ammunition used in the attack inside Crooks’ car. 

In his house he shared with his parents and sister, investigators seized over a dozen weapons, an explosive device, a secondary cellphone, a laptop, a hard drive and three USB flash drives.”

Crooks lived with his parents and sister, and yet they were oblivious to what was about to transpire?

The mention of the tactical vest is unsettling. Every mass murderer with a high kill count seems to have one.

Also, how was Crooks able to carry his gun from his car to the building undetected? Was the gun already waiting for him? Why did Crooks search the internet for “where to buy ammo” on the day of the shooting? He’d also Googled information on previous mass shootings, but it all smells fishy, like someone or a group of someones attempting to cover their tracks. The Secret Service stationed agents in the second floor of the building that Crooks used to shoot from. They had a clear window view of Crooks’ location, but did nothing. What were they doing in there, watching a movie? Was someone with them in there, purposely distracting the other agents from looking out the window? Were their comms even on by that point?

I have no idea how to share X posts on here now, so click the link to watch:

VIDEO: SHOOTER CRAWLING ACROSS ROOF TO GET INTO POSITION

Just insane. Word now is that one police officer climbed up the ladder and confronted the shooter, who then turned the gun towards the officer, causing him to flee rather than engage.

The 2020 film, Possessor, is a portrait of the life of an assassin who, through technology, “possesses” the body of someone, using that body to murder some VIP. The possessor either commits “suicide” in the possessed body, or allows herself to be killed by the responding officers, waking back up safely in her own body. Is this tech in use today? Is it really so hard to consider it a possibility, what with the advances made with Neuralink and others? Many disparate killings have occurred over the past decade, by unassuming individuals with no criminal past, and no evidence of advanced weapons training. And yet they move and kill like a professional, all the while knowing that they are going to their death. Are they “possessed” technologically, by a remote assassin? If so, why is Hollywood seeding the public with these concepts? As a way of mocking us, breadcrumbing us with outlandish truths?

Get a load of the chicken wing on the SS sniper. The Secret Service should be staffed with beasts and killers, not waffling clowns like this guy, or the ponytail brigade running in fearful circles, adding to the chaos. Give Trump private security, let the beasts of Blackwater guard him effectively, not these bozos.

Also, I hear tell that the red band on this guy’s wrist is some sort of Talmudic talisman retardation. Automatically disqualifying.

This is extremely weird. 20-year old Thomas Matthew Crooks, now dead but not before taking the life of an innocent bystander, once appeared in a BlackRock ad (WATCH HERE) looking very normal. Those acquainted with him also considered him normal, albeit a “loner”. There’s also a clip of him receiving his diploma, again, looking very normal. Not much to go on, but it’s enough to make one wonder why someone like this would suddenly throw their life away in an attempt to kill Trump.

Another thing that is odd: both Crooks’ parents were professional behavioral therapists. What does that mean in the big picture? Too soon to say, but the fields of psychology are filled with Frankensteins and Oppenheimers, tinkering with things that should be left alone.

So, the shooting. Crooks had to have known that this was a suicide mission, that he wouldn’t make it out alive. He openly carried a rifle onto a nearby roof, in full view of rally attendees. How did he get onto the roof? Some say that he brought a ladder, or a ladder was already waiting for him. He shimmied across the roof, found a suitable position, waited, and then fired. This all happened while attendees were screaming that someone on the roof had a gun. I’m a little surprised that the gunman wasn’t dressed in military garb, to fool the Secret Service snipers, but it appears that he wore clothes to blend into the crowd of Trump supporters.

So Crooks shoots, fails in his mission, and is immediately killed by counter snipers. All this doesn’t really add up. Is this really an act committed by a relatively normal person? What social and professional circles did Crooks move through? Considering his parents’ profession, and his appearance in the BlackRock ad, I’d say he was in close proximity to very dark organizations and machinations his entire life. I’d say he was used by the permanent state as a disposable tool to achieve the death of Donald Trump.

I honestly think this could be another case of technological possession. There’s always the shadow of the professional in shootings like this one. Crooks came within 1 inch of achieving his aim. How much training would it take to get this close to a candidate, evading the enormous police presence, and come so close to achieving your goal, all the while knowing with certainty that you are about to die a horrible death? Was 20-year old Crooks really capable of all that?

Is America losing faith in democracy? Are we slowly releasing our grip on a grand experiment that some believe should be held onto firmly, no matter the consequences? Or are greater numbers arriving at an inevitable disillusionment, as one does when they realize that the water they see in the distance is just a mirage? We’ve chased this particular mirage far into the desert, and the unspoken conclusion is that we should’ve never chased it in the first place. The illusion of democracy creates unjustifiable dreams in far too many people. Politicians and candidates spout fantasies, dreams that will manifest if they should be elected. The Promised Land never emerges, and the loss of hope instills intense resentment among those who believed the lies.

We should never have indulged the fantasies that come with the democratically-elected Presidency. Who does the President represent, anyway. Has his many incarnations really ever represented us at all? Eight years of some new huckster, borne aloft by his skill at weaving fantasies, spends his tenure as a short-lived activist, ensuring his agenda is fulfilled, never our own. The ideal President would be one who does almost nothing, aside from ensuring the well-oiling of the clockwork machine created by our Founders. But we have had nothing but an unbroken succession of activist Presidents, each throwing the nation manufactured chaos as he makes good on the promises made to his wealthy and influential supporters.

The greatest mistake our nation ever made was made in its infancy, and made by arguably its greatest hero. George Washington retired after two terms to his farm, setting the standard for American Presidents ever since. What would our nation look like now if he’d remained President until his death in 1799, passing the baton to either to one of his three children, or to another of the Founders.

As anathema as it might be to the public conscience, America should have established a hereditary monarchy, of Washington, Jefferson, and Adams. Imagine an unbroken lineage of Adams’ on an American throne and ask yourself honestly if we’d be better off. We most certainly would. Imagine a direct descendant of Jefferson currently sitting on an American throne, us free of the societal fracturing that results from Presidential elections.

Imagine an Eisenhower remaining in office until his death in 1969. A far steadier and sturdier nation would have resulted than what we’d got.

A forgotten tidbit of American history is that, in 1789, America almost did get a king, albeit a Prussian one. In that year, as the relatively weak and disordered nation struggled to maintain control, held together by the Articles of Confederation, Nathanial Gorham (president of the Continental Congress at that time), wrote to Prince Henry of Prussia, son of none other than Frederick the Great. Prince Henry was offered to accept the role of King of the United States. How would history have panned out, had we been ruled over by a Prussian instead of this 8-year succession of grifters and activists?

Democracy eventually ends in dictatorship, so why not head off that inevitability by establishing a constitutional monarchy? Why not establish a university, in the vein of West Point, that breeds future rulers? Why not something, anything, other than what we have now? But we know it won’t happen.

America will cling to democracy as one clings to an opiate addiction, even as it takes its final, narcotic breath.

Springfield, a city of around 55,000 residents, has been thrown into crisis as a result of an influx of 20,000 illegal Haitian migrants having been settled there over the past four years.  This Middle America town has been thrust to the front lines of an engineered demographic revolution known by many as the Great Replacement. Having arrived and settled this area under our far-too-generous asylum system, the city is scrambling to provide housing for these newcomers, ironically providing aid and charity to their replacements.

Why does America, and why do Americans, feel obligated to self-immolate to provide aid to these foreign masses? Why does it seem like we as a culture have no self-respect when it comes to invasion-level immigration? Haiti has fallen into lawless chaos, but why does that mean that we are obligated to accept every person fleeing the chaos?

Time to learn self-respect and put an end to this slow-motion suicide.

Until we free our nation from this tiny country our destiny will be forever out of our control.