UK citizens are unwitting lab rats for the COVID vaccine

Posted on      by     

Two people in the UK went into anaphylactic shock upon receiving the vaccine. And so now the public is being warned that anyone with a history of allergies should probably not be vaccinated. This is extremely reckless, but I am relieved that there hasn’t been a big push for an “all-at-once”, same day vaccination plan for the entire world. There is no telling what type of injuries we’ll see next in the UK following vaccination.

A decidedly unscientific opinion

Posted on      by     

Retirees, teens/young adults in college, and highly-paid professionals are the only ones still buying into COVID doomsday-ism and supporting lockdowns. When I see anyone driving with a mask on, more often than not there is white hair above and shriveled skin behind. Or they appear to be sophomores in college. Or they’re driving a Lexus. These people have no conception of the pain that being thrown out of work can cause. Mainly, because they’re either retired, still on the parental dole, or they are able to work from home, they can indulge in the cinematic aspect of “crisis!” For them, “lockdown” is entirely theoretical. This gives them the opportunity to indulge in the worst of the idiocies being promoted by the Doomsday cult of COVID. There is no cost to it, reality doesn’t grab them by the neck and slap them around while demanding that they snap out of it.

Others aren’t so lucky.

An example: I briefly spoke with a man in his late 30’s, married with three kids, and the topic inevitably turned to COVID. He’d lost his job in the oil field due to the deliberately-induced economic collapse that lockdowns caused. Needless to say, his opinion of COVID was far more nuanced than, say, the married attorneys who work downtown. More nuanced than my 60-something neighbors who are enjoying a secure retirement and can indulge in fantasy.

This man, not retired, working a real job, doesn’t have the privilege of believing a lie. He knew that COVID was nothing more than a mild cold for the vast majority of infected people, and he knew that lockdowns were a crime. I affirmed that, yes, they are crimes against humanity, and that millions are suffering today because this fantastical belief in a boogeyman virus won’t go away.

Italy’s COVID apocalypse that wasn’t

Posted on      by     

Great thread by Alex Berenson, pointing out what we all suspected.

Masks, distancing, and a ruined school year are about unions, not child safety

Posted on      by     

We could easily find, at the drop of a hat, enough adults to staff every school in the US and teach our children, adults who wouldn’t engage in performative fear in order to force these kids into complying with the abusive, soul-killing protocols of masks, “distancing”, et cetera. We could find adults who would never in a million years ask kids to wear masks and not play with their friends in order to feel safe.

This is about union power, not safety. The teachers union is doing this to our kids, not for safety, but for the benefit of their teachers. The teachers’ union itself wants the schools shut down. That should tell you all you need to know about how much they value children.

Four participants in Pfizer’s COVID vaccine trial developed Bell’s palsy

Posted on      by     

From the Daily Mail.

The tragedy that will unfold once these vaccines are administered to vulnerable populations could have been avoided, if people hadn’t been inundated with dishonest fear-inducing propaganda regarding COVID for the past 8 months, and if there hadn’t already existed the strange religious devotion to vaccines.

Get COVID, not the shot.

The NYT article on how 40-cycle PCR tests generate mostly false-positives

Posted on      by     

“Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be”

:

The PCR test amplifies genetic matter from the virus in cycles; the fewer cycles required, the greater the amount of virus, or viral load, in the sample. The greater the viral load, the more likely the patient is to be contagious.

This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients, although it could tell them how infectious the patients are.

In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.

“One solution would be to adjust the cycle threshold used now to decide that a patient is infected. Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.

Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk — akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left, Dr. Mina said.

Any test with a cycle threshold above 35 is too sensitive, agreed Juliet Morrison, a virologist at the University of California, Riverside. “I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” she said.

A more reasonable cutoff would be 30 to 35, she added. Dr. Mina said he would set the figure at 30, or even less. Those changes would mean the amount of genetic material in a patient’s sample would have to be 100-fold to 1,000-fold that of the current standard for the test to return a positive result — at least, one worth acting on.”

 

This is clearly insane. Disastrous public policy is being implemented based on the results of these tests. And if they really are generating 90% false positives, then every COVID policy is based on a lab error. We need an executive order, or piece of legislation that places a 30-cycle cut-off for PCR tests. The bogus case-demic would end, and we could return to our normal lives.