REPUBLIC REBORN

The very real and urgent debate over unpunished police misconduct has been set back years. Now, and ironically thanks to the Black Lives Matter movement, the debate has become an ignorant flame war between idiot groups. One side says abolish police while committing egregious acts of violence against the innocent, the other side defends police no matter what and argues that they need even greater protection and power. It is true that US police kill far more people per capita than any other developed nation. They have vast power, union protection, qualified immunity, and much more. Much of this power and immunity should be stripped of police, but this doesn’t translate into “abolish the police”. Everyone should be exposed to accountability.

The debate should be about equal justice, the protection of the innocent, and swift punishment for those who commit violence against the innocent, regardless of the side of the badge the perp resides. Does this mean we should abolish police? Of course not. Clearly, as seen from the savage riots plaguing American cities, society needs protection against violent thugs. But there must be another institution providing protection, since police clearly are not up to the job when violence truly heats up. Ideally this protection should come from the private sector, since private individuals simultaneously are more easily held accountable, and more readily able to use defensive violence against an imminent threat.

Instead, we have police worshipers on one side, and police haters on the other. This shallow, schoolyard screaming match is what now passes for “debate” over police accountability. It’s pathetic, and we all suffer because of it.

#HappeningNow the protesters in Rochester NY are "shutting down restaurants", tables are broken, people running off scared #rochesterprotests pic.twitter.com/oxmlZp526w

— @SCOOTERCASTER (FNTV) (@ScooterCasterNY) September 5, 2020

The events of the past six months (fundamentally it is only one single event, the sudden emergence and spread of mass hysteria) is comparable to extinction-level events found in the natural world’s history. The difference between this one and those natural phenomena is that this mass hysteria is purely psychological, meaning it doesn’t exist in the physical world. It could be described a a psychic contagion, a virus of the imagination. I’m sure there’s a better way to describe it. But it is interesting that something so destructive could spread so quickly and have such a profound effect on the world economy. And an economy itself is a purely psychic phenomenon, in the sense that our plans, intentions, and predictions exist only in our minds. And those plans and actions are effected, and in turn effect, the plans and actions of others. Society itself is held together by this invisible network of minds, a network of ever-evolving decisions based on individual personal judgments about the present and future state of the world. It’s a strange abyss you find yourself in if you think too long about it.

So, is COVID hysteria destructive and pervasive enough to inflict a mortal wound on the modern world? Has it already? If it is, then I think it’s interesting and significant that the apocalyptic event to decimate our species doesn’t exist in the physical world. This may make little sense, as I’m only just now attempting to finally get this idea out of my head that has been swirling for months.

It’s very interesting that the one event to inflict so much devastation on the modern world in such a short amount of time is non-material, but very real nonetheless.

Marketing disinformation as an academic, governmental or media authority, in order to compel despair, panic or compliance inside a population under duress of epidemic, war or economic collapse – these things are indistinguishable from war crimes. pic.twitter.com/jJ0zn6funI

— Ethical Skeptic ☀ (@EthicalSkeptic) September 4, 2020

Once this is over, there must be an accounting of the crimes committed against entire populations by their governments.

Very illuminating, and now it makes more sense that Bill Gates himself has featured so prominently in the COVID-19 scamdemic. What does Gates want out of all this? What’s his goal? Surely not money. What then? My purely personal theory is that he wants to be remembered as a great historical figure, a quasi-Messiah. Not a very original goal, but a very human one, unfortunately.

That probably tells you all you need to know about this thug.

This is what it will take, industry fighting back.

An email was recently leaked from an Oklahoma regional director to county commissioners, giving them a heads up that COVID cases will soon spike, and not to be alarmed because the number will begin to include “probable” cases.

What is the point of including probable cases? Who decides who is included in the “probable” group?

The PCR tests being administered, with a 90% false positive rate, are worse than useless, and have fraudulently goosed the cases, creating a phony case-demic that state and local governments are using to base policy on. Including “probable” cases will do nothing except keep the phony COVID “pandemic” on life support for next few months, or least until the election.

If the tests are wrong almost all the time, we have to ask ourselves hard questions? How much of the death toll was ever even COVID? It will be impossible for many to admit that all this self-inflicted destruction was in vain, but we must admit it or we’ll never escape it. The inclusion of “probable” cases is just denialism. Society itself is unable to face the reality that the Great Pandemic was, for the most part, a complete farce.

Michael Reinoehl, the man who allegedly shot a Trump supporter in cold blood in Portland, was killed by police during his arrest.