The coroner says there is no exit wound in Charlie Kirk’s body. He was shot in the neck, in an apparent direct hit. Is it remotely possible that there would be no exit wound? For comparison, here is an example of a grizzly bear being shot from 135 yards with the same round. A very clear exit wound, despite traveling through a far greater amount of much denser flesh than human. Does Charlie react in a way that one would expect someone taking a direct hit would react?
I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably…
— Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) September 20, 2025
