China is done with Israel’s garbage

This is an astounding exchange. Unlike the United States, China isn’t afraid to point out the depravity of Israel to their faces. This engenders respect and fear from Israel. Imagine if the US treated these thugs in a similar manner? Instead, we endure the spectacle of our leaders groveling at their feet.

Connectivity’s perdition

The internet was a mistake. That’s not hyperbole, not some glib, cynical, fatalist, jaded throwaway judgment. The internet is ruining us as a species. We were better off without it, without this hideous, insidious, digital drug that we dose ourselves with throughout the day. We’ve become maintenance users of the most dangerous narcotic in history. What has it cost us? Real connection, and are we even able to comprehend the pricelessness of what real connection means, and what we’ve allowed to whither away? But it’s much more than even that. The physical institutions that facilitated real connection are disappearing forever. Everything is closing up shop around us. We’re being drawn into the fake reality of the screen with all its lights, sounds, and seductive filth, all within arm’s reach, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for the rest of our godforsaken lives. The problem is this: how do we stage an intervention when everyone is an addict?

If a button existed that when pushed would delete the internet forever, along with knowledge of how to recreate it, and even the memory of it, I would push it. I hate it more than I’ve ever hated anything. I hate the eradication of connection, of boredom which is the seedbed of the growth of our soul, of character development, of the creativity it stifles and the sloth it encourages. We were better without it. With it, we’re collectively sinking into an eternal sleep. We’re becoming lost in a funhouse mirror maze. And we’re fostering the addiction in children as quickly as possible. When we stare into our screens, we gaze into an abyss that is slowly siphoning our life force, and in its place grows a hideous void.

Many Israeli snipers aren’t even Israeli

Some are American as apple pie.

Did billionaire Bill Ackman and friends ambush Charlie Kirk over being insufficiently sycophantic over Israel?

In early August, Bill Ackman and other pro-Israel TPUSA funders allegedly confronted Charlie Kirk at a meeting in the Hamptons over his supposed lack of total, blind devotion towards Israel. Ackman has since denied this, but reports over the meeting have become a flood. And check out this clip of Kirk speaking just one day after the alleged meeting. Kirk always seemed so jolly that it is impossible to envision him as angry. But this is about as angry as anyone has ever seen him.

Grandmother of Charlie’s killer raises more questions

Debbie Robinson says her grandson probably never fired a gun in his life, and their entire family were MAGA republicans. The distance between the shooter and Charlie was 430 feet, roughly the length of a football field. Could a novice marksman really make that shot first try? Now factor in the fact that he was supposedly killed with an older, Mauser-style, bolt-action rifle. If the bullet was a .30-06, does the close-up footage of the impact match what such a large bullet is capable of? These are just questions, which, in the absence of any information from the FBI, we are forced to ask.

Envisioning an American Duterte

An old quote from Friedrich Hayek has been rolling around in my head for a little over a year: “Personally, I prefer a liberal dictator to a democratic government lacking liberalism”. This was Hayek as quoted in 1981 after his trip to Pinochet’s Chile. He apparently liked much of what he saw, despite Pinochet’s autocratic rule. Pinochet enacted what I would term “liberty-oriented authoritarianism”, in the sense that a dictator holding consolidated power used this power to ‘impose’ freedom. I love it, actually. I love everything about this mode of government, and yes, I want it here. I have no faith in whatever this is that we currently endure.

Another quote has also echoed in mind, from the lips of Anton Chigurh: “If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?” We’ve lived under Constitutionally-sound tyranny for decades. Every consolidation of power has been court-approved, every war, every new social program, every new spy agency. New taxes, new spending, lower standards of living, the future raped for present ephemeral benefit. We vote, we elect representatives, we listen to their godawful speeches and endure the sight of their ugly faces. Every single day. We tell ourselves that whatever happens must be alright, since it happened under the auspices of legal Constitutional action.

We have to admit that something has gone horribly wrong, and that maybe, just maybe, the solution doesn’t lie in the futile attempts to enforce the Constitution through our current form of government. Maybe, just maybe, an American Pinochet, a Yankee Duterte, would be more effective at enforcing the vision of our Founders. Imagine it, a 50-year term, an American hereditary royal dynasty, liberty as state religion. A handful of executive decisionmakers, rather than 535, who commit the worst sins while shifting blame to their colleagues. Lady Columbia, sword in hand. Cobalt, ivory, and crimson.

America seems more than ever a world in waiting of genesis, if only someone would impose it. Not a past, but a future birth. An idea incubated but never fully realized.