The Air Force has captured otherworldly footage from within the eye of hurricane Dorian:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvjyXpoPiFk&t=138s
And here is unbelievable footage of the ‘stadium effect’ from the eye of last year’s Hurricane Michael:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-iRXYRRGXQ
A great editorial has appeared in the California Globe: Why are vaccine adverse events not acknowledged or reported by medical professionals?
When the reports of severe injuries began appearing following the roll-out of the HPV vaccine, the medical profession had a ready-made response: It’s psychosomatic, nothing to see here! Many went so far as to accuse the girls of purposely faking their illnesses in order to derail Gardasil, the new miracle of Science. The pre-teen and teen girls that suffered severe injuries, unbeknownst to them, were about to become part of a growing, ostracized community of the vaccine-injured, due to the fact that the corporate-owned media, corporate-owned governments, and corporate-owned medical profession refused to acknowledge the existence of vaccine injuries. “It’s not possible to be harmed by a vaccine” is the reigning prejudice, and so when someone is in fact injured by a vaccine, everyone up and down the line refuses to admit or even grant the possibility that the vaccine caused it. I believe this attitude is behind the practice of giving multiple vaccines at once. If it were admitted that combining vaccines could be dangerous, in the same way that combining medication is, then it would beg the question of what exactly happens that makes a combo dangerous? Health professionals routinely combine live-virus vaccines with ‘inactive’ ones, while having no idea what the long-term consequences could be for the immune system. A vaccine without a live virus requires an adjuvant to stimulate the immune system, usually aluminum. How is that aluminum interacting with the other vaccines being administered? How is the combination of vaccines affecting the underdeveloped immune systems of children?
These questions aren’t asked, because vaccines are blindly assumed to be safe in an absolute sense. This blind belief has had the effect of ostracizing those who have been severely, and permanently, injured by vaccines. No one believes them, or believes the “one in a million” fiction that so many health professionals unthinkingly parrot. The vaccine-injured don’t even have recourse to sue the manufacturers, but instead go to ‘vaccine court’ and make the case that their injury was indeed caused by the vaccine. If they win then they get a payout, along with an order not to talk about their ordeal or the payout. But if vaccines were truly safe, why the need for blanket legal immunity for vaccine manufacturers? Why the $4 billion in payouts to vaccine victims? Why the desperate effort to keep a lid on the questions regarding vaccine safety? Why the fear-mongering to force vaccine mandates through legislatures?
Why, specifically, the fear-mongering over measles? Out of the around one thousand cases in the U.S., everyone has by now recovered. Measles is a self-limiting infection, it’s gone within a week. Once you’ve had it, you are immune for life. And an inconvenient fact for the pro-vaccine corporate elites regarding their beloved concept of “herd immunity”, the concept itself was developed in reference to natural immunity derived from the majority of a population having previously been infected with measles.
Hundreds of life-threatening infectious diseases exist, yet we only have vaccines for a few. Why aren’t we being wiped out by the rest? Why did every single infectious disease experience the same dramatic decline in mortality during the first half of the twentieth century, despite the lack of a vaccine? Clean water, clean food, hygiene, plumbing, sanitation, all this is the reason that infectious disease has been virtually eliminated, not vaccines. Yet people hold the simultaneous belief that vaccines have saved humanity, and are completely safe. Both are wrong.
PHILIP GIRALDI: Does Israel interfere in American elections?
USA Today: More than 400 police departments working with Ring to view doorbell cam footage
Activist Post: FBI crime lab analyzing two broken cameras from outside Epstein’s cell
J.D. TUCCILLE: The revolving door between government and cable news
JOHN KIRIAKOU: In search of a Russiagate scalp: The entrapment of Maria Butina
BRETIGNE SHAFFER: Are anti-vaxxers violent extremists? Or is this the latest smear tactic?
Reason: Forget the Amazon fires. State-sanctioned deforestation is the bigger problem.
USA Today: Apple apologizes for retaining Siri audio recordings and vows to improve privacy
Digital Trends: Meet the subversive start-up that’s fighting mass surveillance with t-shirts
Quanta: Possible detection of a black hole so big it ‘should not exist’
The mold, Aspergillus, has killed one person, who I assume was a child since it’s a children’s hospital, and sickened five more. The outrageous fact that should receive blanket coverage is that the hospital kept the presence of the deadly mold a secret, and continued to use the operating room. It’s unbelievable, yet how many hospitals across the country also contain a deadly fungi of some stripe, and are keeping quiet about it?
Two Pittsburgh hospitals have seen 5 deaths from mold between 2014 and 2017, and the public only found out about it through a wrongful death lawsuit. Unbelievable. Beyond outrageous. The five deceased had been transplant recipients, and were particularly susceptible to the infection, yet it looks like each hospital continued operating even though they knew the mold was there. The patients, and their families, did not.
Sacramento residents express fear over becoming one of the first cities to launch 5G
There is so much money invested in 5G that inconvenient health concerns will be ignored entirely. Just watch, the 5G infrastructure will be installed and brought online as quickly as possible in an attempt to outrun worry over health risks. But in 10, 20 years, when health outcomes will be more apparent, will they dismantle the network?
How many currently-employed cops are ticking time bombs like this one?
NY Daily News: Parents of schizophrenic man shot dead by off-duty cop in California Costco say they ‘begged’ for son’s life:
““I told Officer Sanchez not to shoot twice. I even said please,” Paola said Monday, fighting back tears. “I was pleading for my son and our lives, but I was still shot in the back.”
Some people go out into public looking for a fight, looking for an opportunity to bait someone into attacking first in order to get a chance to pull their concealed-carry weapon and later claim self-defense, or “I feared for my life”. Many of these people, who feel an urgent need to hold power over others, become cops, and then proceed to harass the public for the thrill it gives them.
And a question that everyone should be asking but no one does: does every cop really need to be armed to the teeth? Their utility belts are weighed down with a buffet of weapons, is this necessary, especially when they are constantly mingling with the public?
For instance. Four crew-cut cops were in Starbucks earlier at the same time that I was, and all four couldn’t even keep their arms at their sides due to all the needless junk strapped to their belts. Guns, batons, pepper spray, tasers, an array of bulging pockets of expensive, useless trinkets that they don’t need. It creates needless danger for the public, who can’t possibly feel safe when these armored and armed men, who for some bizarre reason wear also their sunglasses indoors.
The cops interacting with the public should not be armed for battle. They shouldn’t believe they are in a ‘battlefield’. Cops in that state of mind will invariably see the public as the enemy.
Of course they won’t get kicked out, as the German government fears accusations of ‘racism’. While I’m for fairly open immigration, and an end to the police state surrounding the U.S. border, it seems disastrous for governments to actively invite foreigners en masse with the promise of guaranteed amenities, et cetera. They will come, and they won’t be composed entirely of people deserving of ‘refugee’ status, but they will take the hand-outs.
Fortune: How Amazon and Silicon Valley seduced the Pentagon
Or was it the other way around? Surely the $10 billion JEDI contract dangled in front of Amazon by the Pentagon was the bait needed to lure Amazon into the fold of the Surveillance State, ensuring their compliance with whatever is asked of them. At least now no one can speak of Amazon as a “private” company. They’re private in the manner of Lockheed Martin.